Participant education
Translate approved study concepts into clearer language without changing the official material.
Industry
Clearer participant information, organized study context, and human-reviewed medical AI assistance across the study journey.
The opportunity
Participants face long consent documents, unfamiliar terminology, repeated instructions, and uncertainty about which questions belong with the study team. Staff face the reverse problem: fragmented information that must be reviewed consistently and according to protocol.
Lunas can make both sides easier to navigate. Stethos can explain approved text and help structure a person’s question, while the study team remains responsible for consent, eligibility, adverse events, and protocol interpretation.
Where Lunas fits
Stethos helps explain, organize, and investigate. People and qualified professionals stay responsible for the decisions that follow.
Translate approved study concepts into clearer language without changing the official material.
Help participants identify what they want the investigator or coordinator to explain.
Organize permitted files, notes, and observations for the study team’s review.
Keep study-related context understandable across visits and time points.
A practical workflow
A repeatable path makes the model easier to supervise and the result easier to trust.
Define the official content, protocol constraints, consent language, and escalation path.
Use Lunas to explain terms and prepare questions without replacing informed consent.
Collect the permitted context in a consistent, reviewable form.
Study staff review source information and make all protocol, eligibility, and safety decisions.
Product path
Lunas.One is available to individuals today. Team & Enterprise workspaces and a governed Stethos API are in active development — the roadmap below is directional, not a promise of present availability, and larger deployments will require the right privacy, security, evaluation, and human-review controls.
Available in Lunas
Team, Enterprise & API direction
Questions
No. It can help a person understand terms and prepare questions, but the approved consent process and responsible study team remain essential.
No. Eligibility decisions belong to the investigator and protocol-defined process.
The organizational and education patterns may help both, but every deployment needs study-specific privacy, consent, protocol, regulatory, and validation review.
Try the product
Use Lunas for information and organization, then involve a qualified professional whenever a health decision is needed.